Scotus cases similar to or like Eisenstadt v. Baird
Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. Wikipedia
Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government restriction. The case involved a Connecticut "Comstock law" that prohibited any person from using "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception." Wikipedia
Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court regarding the right to die. Constitutional, and preventing doctors from assisting their patients, even those terminally ill and/or in great pain, was a legitimate state interest that was well within the authority of the state to regulate. Wikipedia
Landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9–0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal", and therefore violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Wikipedia
Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which denied the Arkansas School Board the right to delay desegregation for 30 months. On September 12, 1958, the Warren Court handed down a per curiam decision which held that the states are bound by the Court's decisions and must enforce them even if the states disagree with them, which asserted judicial supremacy established in Marbury v. Madison. Wikipedia
Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that found an electoral district with boundaries created to disenfranchise African Americans violated the Fifteenth Amendment. After passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1957, activists in the city of Tuskegee, Alabama had been slowly making progress in registering African-American voters, whose numbers on the rolls began to approach those of registered white voters. Wikipedia
Sentences forEisenstadt v. Baird
- Later, Justice Douglas concurred in Eisenstadt v. Baird, citing the pamphlet to support striking down restrictions on lecturing about birth control.
- Nor could the law be applied to unmarried heterosexuals, as Eisenstadt v. Baird had extended Griswold to unmarried people.
- Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) extended its holding to unmarried couples, whereas the "right of privacy" in Griswold was said to only apply to marital relationships.
- For unmarried people, the dissemination of birth control did not become legal until the 1972 Supreme Court decision Eisenstadt v. Baird.
- In 1971, Eisenstadt v. Baird extended this right to privacy to single people.
- Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) expanded the scope of sexual privacy rights to unmarried persons.
This will create an email alert. Stay up to date on result for: Eisenstadt v. Baird